The relationship between individuals and the government is essential to our legal system. In personal injury and tort law, it’s crucial to know about governmental immunity. People often wonder if they can sue the government or its agencies, especially when a government official or employee does something wrong and causes harm. Let’s explore this issue.
These terms come from the old belief that the state, or sovereign, was immune to being sued. Over time, with changing common law and constitutional decisions, including ones from the supreme court, this has shifted. Now, the government can be held accountable for wrongful acts, especially if a government employee or official neglects their duty.
Utah’s legislative framework establishes both the immunity and the limitations to that immunity concerning governmental actions. U.C.A. 63G-7-301(2)(h)(i) explicitly waives the government’s immunity in instances where negligence is evident, such as in situations involving unsafe public structures or negligent actions of government employees. This means that if a public servant acts carelessly and causes harm, they can indeed be held accountable.
In this provision’s actual words:
“Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived . . . as to any injury caused by: a defective, unsafe, or dangerous condition of any highway, road, street, alley, crosswalk, sidewalk, culvert, tunnel, bridge, viaduct, or other structure located on them; or any defective or dangerous condition of a public building, structure, dam, reservoir, or other public improvement; and . . . as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed with the scope of employment.”
Let’s consider a tangible example. If a local municipality was aware of a hazardous pothole in the middle of a busy road and neglected to repair it or provide adequate warnings, leading to a car accident where an individual suffered injuries, the municipality might be liable for the resulting personal injury claims. This could be due to their failure in their duty of care to maintain safe road conditions for the public.
Here’s another: Imagine you’re riding your bicycle on a state-maintained trail. Unbeknownst to you, a portion of the trail has severely deteriorated, creating a dangerous condition that’s not immediately visible. Despite several reports to the state parks department, no signs have been posted, nor has any repair been attempted. As you navigate this path, your bike hits the damaged surface, causing you to sustain a serious fall and suffer significant injuries. In this scenario, the state government could potentially be sued for negligence.
The government still retains immunity for certain situations as outlined in U.C.A. 63G-7-201(4). For instance, the government isn’t typically held liable for issues like negligent inspection, natural conditions on public lands, or the refusal to issue specific licenses. So, if a park has natural dangers like a steep cliff, the government might not be blamed if someone gets hurt. Although these exemptions exist, it’s worth noting that they rarely apply to the vast majority of personal injury claims.
On the federal front, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is the cornerstone legislation that allows private individuals to sue the United States for torts committed by persons acting on behalf of the federal government. This act essentially waives the federal government’s sovereign immunity when its employees are negligent within the scope of their employment.
If a public employee, like police officers or other law enforcement, causes injury or even wrongful death while doing their governmental function, the injured party can sue the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. But remember, there are types of claims like workers’ compensation and medical malpractice where rules differ.
The government has established a cap on the amount of compensation that one can receive in a personal injury lawsuit. The reality is that many victims incur damages far exceeding this amount. We had a case where the client was t-boned by a school bus that ran a red light, causing the client’s car to roll. Our client was hospitalized for 10 months, and will live the rest of her life in a wheelchair. Her medical bills exceeded $1,000,000, and she was sure to incur more in the future. The government only had to pay her $717,100, which is only a fraction of her damages.
Suing the government is a process that demands strict attention to detail, given the unique protections and considerations surrounding governmental entities. If you believe you have a valid claim against a government body, follow these steps:
Tip: Choosing the correct government representative to receive this notice is vital. In scenarios involving school-related injuries, for example, the notice must be sent to the district’s superintendent. To eliminate any room for errors, it’s also advisable to send a copy to the Attorney General’s office. Utah has made available a specific database to help individuals determine the correct official recipient, ensuring that your notice reaches the right hands.
The simple answer is, yes. Due to the complexities and intricacies involved in suing the government, having legal representation is highly recommended. Here’s why:
Engaging with the government over personal injury claims can be a complex and nuanced process. However, with the right understanding of the law, its exceptions, and its intricacies, victims can ensure they follow the right procedures and have a fair shot at justice. Always consult with an experienced government liability lawyer to navigate the maze of governmental immunity and seek the compensation you rightfully deserve.
If you believe you may have a claim against a governmental entity or need further understanding about the nuances of governmental immunity, Parker & McConkie is here to guide you. Our extensive experience in personal injury and deep knowledge of the intricacies of filing claims against the state ensure that you’ll have the best representation on your side. Schedule a free consultation today!